H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Sorana Cirstea vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 3-0
Sorana Cirstea holds a 3–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sorana Cirstea leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sorana Cirstea won the 2025 Austin third round 6-3 0-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2025 | Austin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
| May 5, 2016* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Sorana Cirstea | 6-4 7-6(9) | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 343 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sorana Cirstea | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2026 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |