H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Sorana Cirstea vs Petra Martic H2H: 2-3
Petra Martic holds a 3–2 lead over Sorana Cirstea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Petra Martic leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2023 Beijing second round 6-2 2-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2023 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Petra Martic | 6-2 2-6 7-6(3) | Sorana Cirstea | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2023* | Washington | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 6-3 7-6(13) | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Sep 18, 2014* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Petra Martic | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Sorana Cirstea | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2012* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 6-2 6-2 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2012* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Petra Martic | 6-4 6-3 | Sorana Cirstea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 343 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sorana Cirstea | Petra Martic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |