H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Sorana Cirstea vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 1-4

Samantha Stosur holds a 4–1 lead over Sorana Cirstea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2016 Prague third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sorana Cirstea
ROU Age 36 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 27, 2016* Prague WTA 250 R32 Clay Samantha Stosur #25 3-6 6-4 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #131 Match data
Feb 16, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 R32 Hard Samantha Stosur #5 6-4 7-6(5) Sorana Cirstea #49 Match data
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sorana Cirstea #59 7-6(2) 6-3 Samantha Stosur #5 Match data
Aug 8, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 SF Hard Samantha Stosur #19 6-3 6-2 Sorana Cirstea #28 Match data
Jun 4, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Samantha Stosur #32 6-1 6-3 Sorana Cirstea #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sorana Cirstea #17 #17 2,535 2,024 373 343 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,068 451 335 57.4% 1 0 0 4 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sorana Cirstea Samantha Stosur
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #353 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 8–6 57.1% #108 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 25–16 61.0% #36 1,752 0 1 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
19 2009 21–24 46.7% #45 1,691 0 1 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,492 0 0
20 2010 13–23 36.1% #93 1,573 0 1 2004 17–16 51.5% #65 1,609 0 0
21 2011 13–16 44.8% #60 1,600 0 1 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,607 0 0
22 2012 30–26 53.6% #27 1,690 0 1 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,749 0 0
23 2013 33–26 55.9% #22 1,710 0 1 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,723 0 0
24 2014 12–21 36.4% #94 1,593 0 1 2008 17–11 60.7% #52 1,746 0 0
25 2015 1–4 20.0% #242 1,540 0 1 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,885 0 1
26 2016 10–12 45.5% #79 1,612 0 1 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,927 0 2
27 2017 28–20 58.3% #37 1,727 0 1 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,977 1 3
28 2018 13–20 39.4% #84 1,621 0 1 2012 40–23 63.5% #9 1,883 1 3
29 2019 21–16 56.8% #74 1,650 0 1 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,902 1 5
30 2020 4–8 33.3% #71 1,663 0 1 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,883 1 6
31 2021 25–18 58.1% #39 1,755 0 2 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,789 1 8
32 2022 22–20 52.4% #45 1,693 0 2 2016 24–19 55.8% #21 1,716 1 8
33 2023 24–21 53.3% #26 1,826 0 2 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,734 1 9
34 2024 12–16 42.9% #69 1,754 0 2 2018 17–23 42.5% #74 1,663 1 9
35 2025 28–18 60.9% #43 1,870 0 3 2019 14–16 46.7% #99 1,631 1 9
36 2026 30–11 73.2% #17 1,985 0 4 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 — — — — — — — 2021 1–9 10.0% #382 1,522 1 9
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,511 1 9