H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Stefanie Voegele vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 0-1
Carina Witthoeft holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carina Witthoeft leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carina Witthoeft won the 2016 Gstaad third round 6-4 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Carina Witthoeft | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Stefanie Voegele | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |