H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Stefanie Voegele vs Carly Gullickson H2H: 1-0
Stefanie Voegele holds a 1–0 lead over Carly Gullickson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefanie Voegele leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stefanie Voegele won the 2009 Birmingham second round 3-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2009* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Stefanie Voegele | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Carly Gullickson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carly Gullickson | #1,066 | #123 | 532 | 1,546 | 4 | 22 | 15.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefanie Voegele | Carly Gullickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #229 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,379 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |