H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Stefanie Voegele vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 0-1
Flavia Pennetta holds a 1–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Flavia Pennetta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2008 US Open first round 2-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefanie Voegele | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |