H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Stefanie Voegele vs Rossana De Los Ríos H2H: 1-0
Stefanie Voegele holds a 1–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefanie Voegele leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefanie Voegele won the 2009 Portoroz quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2009* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Stefanie Voegele | 6-1 6-1 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefanie Voegele | Rossana De Los Ríos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |