H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Stefanie Voegele vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-1
Stefanie Voegele holds a 2–1 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stefanie Voegele leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefanie Voegele won the 2015 Linz third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | 6-4 7-5 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Oct 15, 2015* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard |
| Tamira Paszek | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data | Jan 16, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard |
| Stefanie Voegele | 7-5 6-4 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Jul 23, 2010* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,714 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefanie Voegele | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |