H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Stephanie Foretz Gacon vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-2

Catalina Castano holds a 2–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catalina Castano leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2005 Stockholm round of 32 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stephanie Foretz Gacon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catalina Castano #70 6-3 7-6(3) Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Aug 11, 2005* R32 Stockholm Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Catalina Castano #111 6-1 6-3 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Mar 24, 2005* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Catalina Castano #1,073 #35 623 1,702 83 110 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stephanie Foretz Gacon Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,604 0 0 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,589 0 0 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,518 0 0
24 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,500 0 0 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,443 0 0 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0 2007 10–20 33.3% #112 1,507 0 0
28 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,496 0 0
29 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,401 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,469 0 0
30 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,499 0 0
31 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,514 0 0
32 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,501 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,510 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,489 0 0
34 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stephanie Foretz Gacon Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 2 9 11 18.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 5 13 18 27.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 31 59 90 34.4% 17 37 54 31.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 26 45 71 36.6% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 74/136 of Stephanie Foretz Gacon's and 80/171 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stephanie Foretz Gacon Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 4/27 1.5 6.8 53.2% 54.0% 39.1% 53.8% 40.0% 47.2% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 5/13 1.2 5.2 56.7% 53.9% 47.6% 47.1% 38.1% 51.2% 42.6% 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 2005 6/19 2.5 7.0 59.4% 57.9% 44.5% 44.9% 46.2% 52.7% 44.4% 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 2006 12/19 1.8 4.7 61.9% 55.5% 38.3% 47.5% 40.8% 49.8% 41.6% 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2007 4/8 1.8 6.8 57.8% 60.3% 32.5% 55.1% 54.2% 48.5% 36.2% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 2008 1/2 1.0 1.0 70.7% 58.5% 23.5% 33.3% 100.0% 48.3% 34.6% 2007 22/30 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 2009 8/9 1.8 4.8 62.8% 61.0% 46.9% 44.2% 42.6% 55.2% 41.2% 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 2010 2/3 1.5 3.5 59.5% 52.1% 24.3% 28.6% 7.1% 41.4% 30.7% 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 2011 7/8 3.0 4.0 58.8% 58.6% 43.5% 50.7% 57.5% 52.6% 39.9% 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 2012 18/20 2.6 3.6 55.5% 63.4% 44.5% 58.3% 46.7% 55.2% 44.8% 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 2013 6/7 1.3 3.7 55.2% 52.9% 37.3% 36.4% 53.7% 46.0% 46.9% 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
34 2015 1/1 13.0 7.0 64.1% 73.8% 36.2% 50.0% 42.9% 60.3% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 74/176 2.2 4.7 58.5% 58.6% 41.4% 49.0% 45.9% 51.6% 42.5% — 80/193 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stephanie Foretz Gacon Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1511 107.7 — — — — — +38 — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1513 105.7 — — — — — +27 — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 2001 1559 118.8 — — — — +31 -46 — 46.4% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.48 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 2002 1605 127.2 — — — — -4 -29 -66 50.0% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.5 +0.03 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 2003 1589 115.5 -3.06 +0.16 0.879 47.0% 0 -51 +46 43.3% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.2 +0.97 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 2004 1532 111.6 -1.58 -0.22 0.873 47.0% -19 +10 — 31.3% -1.19 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 -0.31 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 2005 1501 103.6 -0.99 -0.13 0.938 48.6% -44 -15 +148 29.3% -1.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.82 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 2006 1444 101.7 -4.22 -1.54 0.829 45.8% +32 -13 — 32.6% -1.22 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +0.07 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2007 1457 115.6 -1.06 -2.17 0.702 42.7% +26 — — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.62 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 2008 1455 106.9 +3.39 +4.25 0.669 41.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.46 2007 1508 109.0 -1.79 -1.74 0.883 47.1% -38 +186 — 34.8% -1.20 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.34
28 2009 1421 97.6 -0.52 -1.66 0.920 47.9% +55 -3 +137 30.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.41 2008 1496 111.9 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% -7 +104 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.03
29 2010 1402 102.9 -1.39 -0.34 0.524 35.8% — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.12 2009 1469 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 2011 1407 106.9 -1.79 -0.90 0.842 46.7% +64 -4 — 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10 2010 1500 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +86 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.58
31 2012 1513 113.5 -0.88 +0.34 1.000 50.1% -12 -50 +63 52.3% -0.32 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.73 2011 1514 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +93 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.45
32 2013 1502 102.0 -3.63 +0.69 0.868 46.6% -19 -44 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 2012 1511 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1489 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.12
34 2015 1491 103.0 -2.87 -1.23 1.046 51.0% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1648 117.4 -1.86 -0.48 0.879 47.2% +3 -19 +71 38.2% -0.88 21–35 (38%) 21–15 (58%) 102.5 -0.65 — 1702 117.4 -1.56 -1.33 0.901 47.8% -38 +97 -90 44.4% -0.42 32–39 (45%) 21–21 (50%) 96.8 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.