H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Stephanie Foretz Gacon vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-2
Catalina Castano holds a 2–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catalina Castano leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2005 Stockholm third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2005* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Catalina Castano | 6-3 7-6(3) | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Catalina Castano | 6-1 6-3 | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |