H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sue Barker vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 4-1
Sue Barker holds a 4–1 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1981 Surbiton fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1981* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Sue Barker | 7-5 7-5 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1980* | Manchester | WTA 250 | F | — | Anne Hobbs | 6-4 4-6 9-7 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Dec 14, 1979* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-2 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1979* | Manchester | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Sue Barker | 7-5 4-6 6-0 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1976* | Torquay | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-3 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Anne Hobbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 |