H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sue Barker vs Brenda Remilton H2H: 1-0
Sue Barker holds a 1–0 lead over Brenda Remilton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1981 Surbiton third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1981* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-4 | Brenda Remilton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Brenda Remilton | — | — | — | 1,673 | 39 | 44 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sue Barker | Brenda Remilton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–19 | 53.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |