H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sue Barker vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-0
Sue Barker holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1981 Brighton third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1981* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 7-6 6-2 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sue Barker | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |