H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sue Barker vs Marcella Mesker H2H: 0-1
Marcella Mesker holds a 1–0 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcella Mesker leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcella Mesker won the 1982 Lugano fourth round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1982* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Marcella Mesker | 6-1 7-6 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Marcella Mesker | #394 | #31 | 22 | 1,791 | 103 | 134 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Marcella Mesker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1982 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1983 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1984 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1985 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #148 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #369 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |