H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sue Barker vs Pam Shriver H2H: 5-6

Pam Shriver holds a 6–5 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 4–2 on carpet, while Sue Barker leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1983 Brighton quarterfinal 6-1 2-6 6-2.

GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 6
11 main draw meetings
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 1983* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver 6-1 2-6 6-2 Sue Barker Match data
Jul 28, 1983 Sydney Indoors WTA 250 RR Carpet Pam Shriver 6-1 6-1 Sue Barker Match data
Feb 25, 1983* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver 6-7 6-4 6-2 Sue Barker Match data
Nov 19, 1982* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Grass Pam Shriver 6-3 6-2 Sue Barker Match data
Oct 7, 1982* Deerfield Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Pam Shriver 6-0 6-4 Sue Barker Match data
Feb 20, 1982* Houston WTA 250 SF Carpet Pam Shriver 6-2 6-4 Sue Barker Match data
Aug 15, 1981* Richmond WTA 250 SF Hard Sue Barker 5-7 7-6 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data
Jan 31, 1980* Seattle WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sue Barker 1-6 6-4 6-0 Pam Shriver Match data
Dec 15, 1979* Adelaide WTA 500 QF Grass Sue Barker 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data
Aug 16, 1979* Richmond WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sue Barker 6-1 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data
Jul 2, 1978* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Sue Barker 2-6 8-6 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sue Barker #162 #57 2,257 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% 1,513 0 0
15 1971 1–1 50.0% 1,526 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% 1,849 0 1
16 1972 3–2 60.0% 1,543 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% 1,798 0 1
17 1973 8–6 57.1% 1,571 0 1 1980 47–21 69.1% 2,027 0 2
18 1974 40–20 66.7% 1,771 0 6 1981 58–25 69.9% 2,122 0 4
19 1975 50–19 72.5% 1,967 0 11 1982 47–19 71.2% 2,087 0 5
20 1976 64–23 73.6% 2,057 1 14 1983 52–15 77.6% 2,161 0 8
21 1977 51–18 73.9% 2,107 1 16 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1978 16–14 53.3% 1,922 1 17 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1979 54–24 69.2% 2,017 1 20 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1980 34–18 65.4% 1,931 1 20 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1981 28–18 60.9% 1,959 1 21 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1982 11–19 36.7% 1,803 1 21 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1983 18–20 47.4% 1,750 1 22 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,556 1 22 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24