H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sue Barker vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-2
Patricia Medrado holds a 2–0 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1984 Berlin second round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1984* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-3 7-6 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1982* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 7-5 6-2 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |