H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sue Barker vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 2-3

Yvonne Vermaak holds a 3–2 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 2–0 on carpet, while Yvonne Vermaak leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1983 Birmingham fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sue Barker
GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Yvonne Vermaak
RSA Age 69 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 7, 1983* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Yvonne Vermaak 6-3 6-1 Sue Barker Match data
Nov 24, 1982* Sydney WTA 500 R64 Grass Yvonne Vermaak 7-5 6-2 Sue Barker Match data
Oct 25, 1979* Tampa WTA 250 R32 Hard Yvonne Vermaak 6-0 5-7 6-2 Sue Barker Match data
Feb 28, 1979* Dallas WTA 250 R64 Carpet Sue Barker 6-2 6-3 Yvonne Vermaak Match data
Feb 3, 1978* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sue Barker 6-2 6-1 Yvonne Vermaak Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sue Barker #162 #57 — 2,257 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Yvonne Vermaak #558 #38 10 1,891 239 249 49.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Yvonne Vermaak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,543 0 0 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
17 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,571 0 1 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,489 0 0
18 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,771 0 6 1975 15–12 55.6% — 1,599 0 0
19 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,967 0 11 1976 8–10 44.4% — 1,607 0 1
20 1976 64–23 73.6% — 2,057 1 14 1977 20–14 58.8% — 1,766 0 2
21 1977 51–18 73.9% — 2,107 1 16 1978 29–23 55.8% — 1,797 0 2
22 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,922 1 17 1979 15–23 39.5% — 1,781 0 2
23 1979 54–24 69.2% — 2,017 1 20 1980 19–18 51.4% — 1,740 0 2
24 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,931 1 20 1981 19–28 40.4% — 1,721 0 2
25 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,959 1 21 1982 36–27 57.1% — 1,819 0 2
26 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,803 1 21 1983 33–26 55.9% — 1,754 0 4
27 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,750 1 22 1984 29–28 50.9% #41 1,801 0 5
28 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,556 1 22 1985 8–21 27.6% #41 1,605 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1986 6–11 35.3% #104 1,565 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #201 1,558 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #287 1,542 0 5