H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sue Saliba vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-1

Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Sue Saliba in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1981 Indianapolis round of 64 6-2 6-1.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale 6-2 6-1 Sue Saliba Match data Aug 5, 1981* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Saliba 1,767 69 63 52.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Saliba Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 15–10 60.0% 1,597 0 0
17 1981 30–17 63.8% 1,810 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% 1,516 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,745 0 0
19 1977 10–10 50.0% 1,564 0 1 1983 23–20 53.5% 1,770 0 0
20 1978 6–7 46.2% 1,553 0 1 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1979 9–9 50.0% 1,570 0 1 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1980 34–17 66.7% 1,707 0 3 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1981 8–16 33.3% 1,617 0 3 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,608 0 3 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Saliba Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 8 7 15 53.3%
17 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1980 3 5 8 37.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 12 6 18 66.7% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 11 17 35.3% 22 14 36 61.1% 32 33 65 49.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Saliba Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1598 118.7 +29 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 +2.02
17 1981 1811 140.3 -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1976 1517 103.0 +50 38.5% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.15 1982 1745 140.3 -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1977 1565 109.0 +65 -60 51.1% -0.15 3–4 (43%) +2.53 1983 1770 144.1 -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1978 1553 104.6 +1 48.3% -0.62 1–2 (33%) +1.36 1984 1914 155.3 +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1979 1571 105.8 +17 +7 47.6% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 0–2 +2.49 1985 1814 137.6 +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1980 1708 124.6 -165 -31 -2 62.7% +1.09 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 105.6 +2.25 1986 1788 137.1 -56 +52 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1981 1617 108.1 -60 +46 +39 41.8% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) +1.84 1987 1673 114.3 -20 -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) -0.50
24 1982 1608 95.0 0.0% -4.50 -0.02 1988 1552 100.5 +25 +207 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1989 1547 93.6 0.0% -5.50 -0.21
26 1990 1526 90.6 0.0% -5.00 +0.21
Career 1768 115.2 -109 +4 -3 52.0% +0.09 20–18 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 98.6 +8.09 1944 143.5 +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.