H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sue Saliba vs Tanya Harford H2H: 1-0

Sue Saliba holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sue Saliba leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Saliba won the 1980 Beckenham round of 32 7-6 6-7 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Saliba 7-6 6-7 6-4 Tanya Harford Match data Jun 5, 1980* R32 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Saliba 1,767 69 63 52.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tanya Harford 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Saliba Tanya Harford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
16 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,479 0 0
17 1976 4–5 44.4% 1,512 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% 1,516 0 0 1977 7–13 35.0% 1,559 0 0
19 1977 10–10 50.0% 1,564 0 1 1978 3–6 33.3% 1,558 0 0
20 1978 6–7 46.2% 1,553 0 1 1979 13–10 56.5% 1,716 0 0
21 1979 9–9 50.0% 1,570 0 1 1980 12–20 37.5% 1,673 0 0
22 1980 34–17 66.7% 1,707 0 3 1981 8–10 44.4% 1,630 0 0
23 1981 8–16 33.3% 1,617 0 3 1982 3–5 37.5% 1,629 0 0
24 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,608 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Saliba Tanya Harford
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1980 4 4 8 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1980 3 5 8 37.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 12 6 18 66.7% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 11 17 35.3% 22 14 36 61.1% 32 33 65 49.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Saliba Tanya Harford
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1497 100.1 0.0% -3.50 -0.14
16 1975 1479 94.2 0.0% -4.00 +0.26
17 1976 1512 106.0 +67 +25 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 +0.59
18 1976 1517 103.0 +50 38.5% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.15 1977 1559 123.8 +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04
19 1977 1565 109.0 +65 -60 51.1% -0.15 3–4 (43%) +2.53 1978 1559 111.9 +34 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 +0.55
20 1978 1553 104.6 +1 48.3% -0.62 1–2 (33%) +1.36 1979 1716 133.6 -51 -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24
21 1979 1571 105.8 +17 +7 47.6% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 0–2 +2.49 1980 1674 130.7 -52 -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35
22 1980 1708 124.6 -165 -31 -2 62.7% +1.09 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 105.6 +2.25 1981 1631 111.6 +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28
23 1981 1617 108.1 -60 +46 +39 41.8% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) +1.84 1982 1629 118.4 -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.05
24 1982 1608 95.0 0.0% -4.50 -0.02
Career 1768 115.2 -109 +4 -3 52.0% +0.09 20–18 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 98.6 +8.09 1785 128.9 -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.