H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs Amanda Brown H2H: 0-1

Amanda Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Brown leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Brown won the 1983 Brisbane International round of 64 6-3 7-6.

AUS Age 64
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Brown 6-3 7-6 Susan Leo Match data Nov 16, 1983* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Amanda Brown 1,653 48 55 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Amanda Brown
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,485 0 0 1980 1–3 25.0% 1,475 0 0
16 1981 9–4 69.2% 1,559 0 0
17 1979 9–4 69.2% 1,588 0 1 1982 12–4 75.0% 1,635 0 0
18 1980 17–12 58.6% 1,636 0 2 1983 7–12 36.8% 1,595 0 1
19 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,582 0 2 1984 14–18 43.8% 1,611 0 1
20 1982 6–13 31.6% 1,589 0 2 1985 5–13 27.8% 1,577 0 1
21 1983 8–19 29.6% 1,531 0 2 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,556 0 1
22 1984 7–12 36.8% 1,563 0 2
23 1985 0–6 0.0% 1,503 0 2
24 1986 3–3 50.0% 1,519 0 2
25 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,478 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Leo Amanda Brown
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1981 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 2 0 2 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1983 2 4 6 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% 13 15 28 46.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Leo Amanda Brown
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1486 94.6 0.0% -4.75 +0.12 1980 1476 101.6 25.0% -1.00 -0.05
16 1981 1560 119.3 66.7% +1.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.47
17 1979 1589 130.2 -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.81 1982 1635 123.4 -58 73.5% +2.32 1–1 2–0 +2.21
18 1980 1636 124.0 -22 -114 -14 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +2.01 1983 1596 107.2 -21 -2 38.1% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +0.68
19 1981 1583 114.6 -13 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +1.16 1984 1611 109.9 -60 -13 +27 44.6% -0.58 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 103.1 +1.65
20 1982 1590 119.8 -84 -53 +9 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 -1.51 1985 1578 109.4 -9 -25 29.3% -1.41 3–2 (60%) 1–1 -0.07
21 1983 1531 107.7 -28 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.73 1986 1556 98.8 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.31
22 1984 1564 112.7 -56 -58 +42 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.57
23 1985 1504 94.7 -44 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 +0.34
24 1986 1520 96.8 -34 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) +1.27
25 1987 1479 99.1 0.0% -2.88 0–1 +0.22
Career 1674 118.6 -33 -67 +13 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.69 1654 115.8 -38 -36 +1 46.7% -0.16 12–13 (48%) 13–8 (62%) 102.5 +5.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.