H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Susan Leo vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-3
Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Andrea Jaeger | 6-3 6-2 | Susan Leo | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Jaeger | 6-2 6-3 | Susan Leo | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1980 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Jaeger | 6-4 6-3 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Andrea Jaeger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |