H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Susan Leo vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 1-4

Anne Hobbs holds a 4–1 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anne Hobbs leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1987 Birmingham second round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Susan Leo
Age 64
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 1987* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Anne Hobbs #71 6-1 6-4 Susan Leo Match data
Jun 5, 1982* Manchester WTA 250 SF Grass Anne Hobbs 6-2 4-6 6-2 Susan Leo Match data
Apr 22, 1982* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Susan Leo 6-3 3-6 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data
Nov 6, 1981* Hong Kong WTA 250 R16 Clay Anne Hobbs 0-6 6-1 6-0 Susan Leo Match data
Sep 17, 1981* Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 R32 Carpet Anne Hobbs 6-4 4-6 6-2 Susan Leo Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Susan Leo — — — 1,678 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anne Hobbs #583 #35 18 1,842 174 164 51.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Anne Hobbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
17 1979 9–4 69.2% — 1,589 0 1 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,576 0 2
18 1980 17–12 58.6% — 1,639 0 2 1978 26–14 65.0% — 1,729 0 3
19 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,584 0 2 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,756 0 3
20 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,590 0 2 1980 26–18 59.1% — 1,755 0 5
21 1983 8–19 29.6% — 1,532 0 2 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5
22 1984 7–12 36.8% — 1,564 0 2 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6
23 1985 0–6 0.0% — 1,504 0 2 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,752 0 7
24 1986 3–3 50.0% — 1,520 0 2 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7
25 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,479 0 2 1985 13–12 52.0% #63 1,777 0 8
26 — — — — — — — 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,679 0 8
27 — — — — — — — 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,609 0 8