Susan Leo
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Alycia Moulton | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 1983 | H2H |
| Rene Blount | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 22, 1983 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 15, 1984 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Anne Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1982 Wimbledon round of 64 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | 6-4 6-4 | Susan Leo | Match data | Jun 25, 1982* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Anne Smith | 6-3 6-1 | Susan Leo | Match data | May 27, 1982* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,674 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,051 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,900 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Susan Leo | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
| 18 | 1980 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 19 | 1981 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1979 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% |
| 20 | 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% |
| 21 | 1983 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1981 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% |
| 22 | 1984 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% |
| 23 | 1985 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Career | — | 14 | 27 | 41 | 34.1% | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 24 | 38 | 62 | 38.7% | 3 | 13 | 16 | 18.8% | — | 67 | 49 | 116 | 57.8% | 20 | 24 | 44 | 45.5% | 37 | 27 | 64 | 57.8% | 88 | 73 | 161 | 54.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Susan Leo | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1977 | 1486 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.75 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 1589 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -32 | 69.0% | +1.72 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.81 | 1977 | 1634 | 138.6 | — | — | — | — | +87 | — | — | 70.4% | +1.74 | 2–3 (40%) | — | — | +1.53 |
| 18 | 1980 | 1636 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -114 | -14 | 59.1% | +0.95 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.3 | +2.01 | 1978 | 1777 | 139.8 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 68.3% | +1.39 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–0 (100%) | 101.7 | +0.88 |
| 19 | 1981 | 1583 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -51 | +37 | 36.2% | -0.71 | 4–9 (31%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.5 | +1.16 | 1979 | 1849 | 152.6 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -187 | -232 | 48.5% | -0.04 | 13–9 (59%) | 7–6 (54%) | 108.4 | -3.77 |
| 20 | 1982 | 1590 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | -84 | -53 | +9 | 36.2% | -1.06 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–0 | — | -1.51 | 1980 | 1866 | 144.9 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -177 | -216 | 47.8% | -0.08 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.9 | -5.69 |
| 21 | 1983 | 1531 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +15 | +33 | 30.5% | -1.22 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.5 | +0.73 | 1981 | 1936 | 153.7 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -231 | -156 | 57.9% | +0.56 | 9–9 (50%) | 5–9 (36%) | 98.6 | -4.67 |
| 22 | 1984 | 1564 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | -56 | -58 | +42 | 39.0% | -0.63 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.4 | +0.57 | 1982 | 1899 | 156.9 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -216 | -37 | 60.2% | +0.58 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.2 | -0.82 |
| 23 | 1985 | 1504 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | -44 | — | — | 7.7% | -2.77 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.34 | 1983 | 1898 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | — | 51.1% | +0.02 | 5–2 (71%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.5 | -2.37 |
| 24 | 1986 | 1520 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | -34 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.93 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +1.27 | 1984 | 1875 | 92.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.29 |
| 25 | 1987 | 1479 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.88 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.22 | 1985 | 1900 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | — | -248 | -3 | 64.5% | +0.90 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–0 | — | -1.34 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1719 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -56 | — | 40.9% | -0.36 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.98 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1786 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | +60 | 60.0% | +0.69 | 4–3 (57%) | 0–1 | — | +0.68 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1778 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.21 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.68 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1851 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | — | 58.3% | +0.50 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.0 | -0.03 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1828 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | +19 | 53.7% | +0.49 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.2 | -1.19 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1822 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 60.7% | +0.46 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 1674 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -67 | +13 | 40.9% | -0.50 | 17–29 (37%) | 10–20 (33%) | 90.5 | +3.69 | — | 2051 | 154.3 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -189 | -73 | 54.9% | +0.38 | 58–49 (54%) | 38–35 (52%) | 106.1 | -4.21 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Alycia Moulton | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 1983 | H2H |
| Rene Blount | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 22, 1983 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 1 | 21 | 22 | Feb 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Tracy Austin | 1 | 9 | 10 | Feb 18, 1983 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 4 | 5 | 9 | Nov 10, 1989 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 1 | 8 | 9 | Apr 30, 1983 | H2H |
| Mary Lou Piatek | 7 | 1 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |