H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Susan Leo vs Anne Smith H2H: 0-2
Anne Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1982 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Anne Smith | 6-4 6-4 | Susan Leo | Match data |
| May 27, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Anne Smith | 6-3 6-1 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |