H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs E Robb H2H: 1-0

Susan Leo holds a 1–0 lead over E Robb in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Susan Leo won the 1980 Glasgow round of 32 6-1 6-1.

AUS Age 64
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Susan Leo 6-1 6-1 E Robb Match data May 29, 1980* R32 Glasgow WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo — — — 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
E Robb — — — 1,500 0 4 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Susan Leo E Robb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
1979 9–4 69.2% — 1,588 0 1 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,471 0 0
1980 17–12 58.6% — 1,636 0 2 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,461 0 0
1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,583 0 2 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,450 0 0
1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,590 0 2 — — — — — — —
1983 8–19 29.6% — 1,531 0 2 — — — — — — —
1984 7–12 36.8% — 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
1985 0–6 0.0% — 1,504 0 2 — — — — — — —
1986 3–3 50.0% — 1,520 0 2 — — — — — — —
1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,478 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Susan Leo E Robb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1979 — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% Career — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Susan Leo E Robb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1977 1486 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.75 — — — +0.12 1975 1487 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04
1979 1589 130.2 — — — — — — -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.81 1976 1471 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
1980 1636 124.4 — — — — -20 -114 -15 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +1.95 1979 1462 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.10
1981 1583 114.9 — — — — -11 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +1.13 1980 1451 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
1982 1590 119.9 — — — — -83 -52 +10 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 — -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1531 107.8 — — — — -27 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 100.4 +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1564 112.8 — — — — -55 -57 +44 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1504 94.8 — — — — -43 — — 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1520 96.8 — — — — -33 — — 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 1479 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.88 — 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1674 118.8 — — — — -31 -66 +14 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.50 Career 1500 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +3.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.