H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Susan Leo vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-1
Susan Leo and Heather Ludloff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Susan Leo leads 1–0 on clay, while Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1987 Newport third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 64
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1987* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Heather Ludloff | 6-4 7-5 | Susan Leo | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1980* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Susan Leo | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Heather Ludloff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |