H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-1

Susan Leo and Heather Ludloff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Susan Leo leads 1–0 on clay, while Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1987 Newport round of 32 6-4 7-5.

AUS Age 64
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Ludloff #119 6-4 7-5 Susan Leo Match data Jul 16, 1987* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Susan Leo 6-3 3-6 6-1 Heather Ludloff Match data Nov 7, 1980* R16 Hong Kong Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Heather Ludloff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,485 0 0
17 1979 9–4 69.2% 1,588 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0
18 1980 17–12 58.6% 1,636 0 2 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0
19 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,582 0 2 1980 2–5 28.6% 1,465 0 0
20 1982 6–13 31.6% 1,589 0 2 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,440 0 0
21 1983 8–19 29.6% 1,531 0 2 1982 3–4 42.9% 1,473 0 0
22 1984 7–12 36.8% 1,563 0 2 1983 7–15 31.8% 1,514 0 0
23 1985 0–6 0.0% 1,503 0 2 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0
24 1986 3–3 50.0% 1,519 0 2 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0
25 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,478 0 2 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Leo Heather Ludloff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 0 5 5 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Leo Heather Ludloff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1486 94.6 0.0% -4.75 +0.12
17 1979 1589 130.2 -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.81 1978 1488 88.8 0.0% -6.00 +0.21
18 1980 1636 124.0 -22 -114 -14 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +2.01 1979 1483 102.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.05
19 1981 1583 114.6 -13 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +1.16 1980 1465 105.1 +53 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.22
20 1982 1590 119.8 -84 -53 +9 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 -1.51 1981 1441 97.7 20.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.27
21 1983 1531 107.7 -28 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.73 1982 1473 106.3 +70 46.7% -0.27 0–1 +0.83
22 1984 1564 112.7 -56 -58 +42 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.57 1983 1515 109.9 +14 +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12
23 1985 1504 94.7 -44 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 +0.34 1984 1546 102.7 -41 +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.91
24 1986 1520 96.8 -34 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) +1.27 1985 1488 104.3 -35 +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47
25 1987 1479 99.1 0.0% -2.88 0–1 +0.22 1986 1474 99.0 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.19
26 1987 1542 110.3 -48 +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85
27 1988 1504 112.8 -63 +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36
28 1989 1468 103.4 +3 +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 +1.53
29 1990 1457 97.4 -10 +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.40
30 1991 1503 120.4 -99 +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37
31 1992 1473 105.8 -96 +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.01
Career 1674 118.6 -33 -67 +13 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.69 1576 110.5 -27 +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.