H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Susan Leo vs Helena Sukova H2H: 0-1
Helena Sukova holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1982 Lugano second round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1982* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |