H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Susan Leo vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 1-1
Susan Leo and Ivanna Madruga are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivanna Madruga leads 1–0 on clay, while Susan Leo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Susan Leo won the 1981 Wimbledon first round 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Susan Leo | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Ivanna Madruga | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1980* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 6-0 6-2 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ivanna Madruga | — | — | — | 1,916 | 131 | 88 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Ivanna Madruga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 25–12 | 67.6% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |