H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-2

Laura Arraya holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1984 Fort Lauderdale round of 32 7-5 6-2.

AUS Age 64
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Arraya #21 7-5 6-2 Susan Leo Match data Sep 20, 1984* R32 Fort Lauderdale WTA 250 Hard
Laura Arraya #34 6-4 1-6 6-1 Susan Leo Match data Apr 6, 1984* R16 Miami Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,485 0 0
17 1979 9–4 69.2% 1,588 0 1 1981 19–8 70.4% 1,685 0 4
18 1980 17–12 58.6% 1,636 0 2 1982 33–17 66.0% 1,741 0 7
19 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,582 0 2 1983 23–23 50.0% 1,712 0 7
20 1982 6–13 31.6% 1,589 0 2 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,759 0 8
21 1983 8–19 29.6% 1,531 0 2 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1984 7–12 36.8% 1,563 0 2 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1985 0–6 0.0% 1,503 0 2 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1986 3–3 50.0% 1,519 0 2
25 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,478 0 2 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Leo Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Leo Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1486 94.6 0.0% -4.75 +0.12
17 1979 1589 130.2 -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.81 1981 1685 129.1 -70 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) -1.24
18 1980 1636 124.0 -22 -114 -14 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) +2.01 1982 1742 126.9 -61 -27 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) +2.71
19 1981 1583 114.6 -13 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) +1.16 1983 1713 125.7 +8 +30 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) +0.84
20 1982 1590 119.8 -84 -53 +9 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 -1.51 1984 1760 130.6 -102 +141 -132 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) +0.94
21 1983 1531 107.7 -28 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) +0.73 1985 1692 124.9 -2 +60 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) +1.84
22 1984 1564 112.7 -56 -58 +42 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) +0.57 1986 1718 138.1 -26 +100 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) -1.79
23 1985 1504 94.7 -44 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 +0.34 1987 1770 133.4 -31 -11 -184 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) -2.60
24 1986 1520 96.8 -34 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) +1.27
25 1987 1479 99.1 0.0% -2.88 0–1 +0.22 1989 1883 136.8 -8 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) +0.41
26 1990 1821 141.9 +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) +0.41
27 1991 1823 132.7 +13 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) +2.96
28 1992 1733 139.0 +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) +1.62
29 1993 1682 125.0 +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 -0.06
Career 1674 118.6 -33 -67 +13 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.69 1923 138.4 -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.