H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Susan Leo vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-2
Laura Arraya holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1984 Fort Lauderdale third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1984* | Fort Lauderdale | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 7-5 6-2 | Susan Leo | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1984* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |