H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Susan Leo vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 0-1
Marie Pinterova holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marie Pinterova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marie Pinterova won the 1980 Sydney second round 1-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 64
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1980* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Marie Pinterova | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |