H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-1

Susan Leo and Mercedes Paz are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Susan Leo leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mercedes Paz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1986 Singapore round of 16 5-6 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Susan Leo
AUS Age 64
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mercedes Paz
ARG Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mercedes Paz #59 5-6 6-0 6-0 Susan Leo Match data Oct 24, 1986* R16 Singapore WTA 250 Hard
Susan Leo 7-6 7-6 Mercedes Paz #55 Match data Oct 10, 1986* R16 Taipei WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo — — — 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mercedes Paz #521 #28 185 1,822 145 184 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Mercedes Paz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1979 9–4 69.2% — 1,588 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1980 17–12 58.6% — 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,582 0 2 1985 7–11 38.9% #115 1,526 0 1
20 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,589 0 2 1986 22–23 48.9% #60 1,577 0 1
21 1983 8–19 29.6% — 1,531 0 2 1987 15–20 42.9% #88 1,637 0 1
22 1984 7–12 36.8% — 1,563 0 2 1988 24–15 61.5% #44 1,779 0 2
23 1985 0–6 0.0% — 1,503 0 2 1989 13–19 40.6% #91 1,647 0 2
24 1986 3–3 50.0% — 1,519 0 2 1990 25–20 55.6% #32 1,775 0 3
25 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,478 0 2 1991 19–23 45.2% #71 1,683 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1992 10–19 34.5% #107 1,606 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1993 2–11 15.4% #213 1,491 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1994 3–10 23.1% #140 1,474 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1995 4–8 33.3% #164 1,451 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1996 1–5 16.7% #124 1,442 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Leo Mercedes Paz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1985 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 8 10 18 44.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — —
23 1985 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 6 6 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
25 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% — 41 57 98 41.8% 93 98 191 48.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 8 17 25 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Leo Mercedes Paz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1486 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.75 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 1589 130.2 — — — — — — -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 1636 124.0 — — — — -22 -114 -14 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +2.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1583 114.6 — — — — -13 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +1.16 1985 1526 110.7 — — — — +40 +38 — 40.9% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.74
20 1982 1590 119.8 — — — — -84 -53 +9 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 — -1.51 1986 1577 119.8 — — — — -30 +125 — 50.5% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +3.38
21 1983 1531 107.7 — — — — -28 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.73 1987 1637 131.6 — — — — -16 +33 — 45.6% -0.18 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.70
22 1984 1564 112.7 — — — — -56 -58 +42 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.57 1988 1780 134.3 — — — — -56 -13 — 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 4–3 (57%) 106.9 +0.57
23 1985 1504 94.7 — — — — -44 — — 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 — +0.34 1989 1648 125.8 — — — — -60 +126 — 45.9% -0.22 2–8 (20%) 8–7 (53%) 94.4 +0.43
24 1986 1520 96.8 — — — — -34 — — 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +1.27 1990 1776 143.2 — — — — -121 +116 — 54.3% +0.15 8–9 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 101.6 -2.36
25 1987 1479 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.88 — 0–1 — +0.22 1991 1684 124.3 — — — — +2 +72 — 45.2% -0.53 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +1.48
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1606 128.7 — — — — -21 +95 — 42.6% -0.54 1–9 (10%) 2–1 (67%) 91.7 -1.41
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1491 102.6 — — — — +47 +87 — 24.1% -1.38 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.61
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1474 115.3 — — — — +29 +93 — 22.2% -1.81 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1452 102.8 — — — — +50 +58 — 36.0% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1442 97.8 — — — — — +17 — 16.7% -2.67 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 1674 118.6 — — — — -33 -67 +13 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.69 — 1822 131.0 — — — — -28 +76 — 45.9% -0.29 37–61 (38%) 38–33 (54%) 96.4 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.