H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1983 Brighton round of 32 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Susan Leo
AUS Age 64
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman 6-4 3-6 6-4 Susan Leo Match data Oct 20, 1983* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo — — — 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1979 9–4 69.2% — 1,588 0 1 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1980 17–12 58.6% — 1,636 0 2 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,582 0 2 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,589 0 2 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1983 8–19 29.6% — 1,531 0 2 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1984 7–12 36.8% — 1,563 0 2 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1985 0–6 0.0% — 1,503 0 2 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1986 3–3 50.0% — 1,519 0 2 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,478 0 2 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Leo Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1979 — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1985 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Leo Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1486 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.75 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1979 1589 130.2 — — — — — — -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.81 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1980 1636 124.0 — — — — -22 -114 -14 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +2.01 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1981 1583 114.6 — — — — -13 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +1.16 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1982 1590 119.8 — — — — -84 -53 +9 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 — -1.51 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1983 1531 107.7 — — — — -28 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.73 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1984 1564 112.7 — — — — -56 -58 +42 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.57 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1985 1504 94.7 — — — — -44 — — 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 — +0.34 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1986 1520 96.8 — — — — -34 — — 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +1.27 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1987 1479 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.88 — 0–1 — +0.22 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1674 118.6 — — — — -33 -67 +13 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.69 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.