H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Susan Leo vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 0-2

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1985 Melbourne third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Susan Leo
Age 64
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 16, 1985* Melbourne WTA 250 R32 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank #36 6-1 6-3 Susan Leo Match data
Sep 22, 1983* Richmond WTA 250 R32 Carpet Rosalyn Fairbank 6-0 6-3 Susan Leo Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Susan Leo — — — 1,678 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1979 9–4 69.2% — 1,589 0 1 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1980 17–12 58.6% — 1,639 0 2 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1981 9–21 30.0% — 1,584 0 2 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,590 0 2 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1983 8–19 29.6% — 1,532 0 2 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1984 7–12 36.8% — 1,564 0 2 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1985 0–6 0.0% — 1,504 0 2 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1986 3–3 50.0% — 1,520 0 2 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,479 0 2 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1