H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Susan Leo vs Sandy Collins H2H: 1-0
Susan Leo holds a 1–0 lead over Sandy Collins in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Susan Leo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Susan Leo won the 1983 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Susan Leo | 6-2 6-3 | Sandy Collins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sandy Collins | — | — | — | 1,823 | 89 | 151 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Sandy Collins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,394 | 0 | 0 |