H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 0-1

Stacy Margolin holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stacy Margolin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stacy Margolin won the 1981 Richmond round of 32 6-2 6-3.

AUS Age 64
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stacy Margolin 6-2 6-3 Susan Leo Match data Aug 13, 1981* R32 Richmond WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Stacy Margolin 1,854 73 99 42.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Stacy Margolin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,485 0 0
17 1979 9–4 69.2% 1,588 0 1 1976 2–1 66.7% 1,523 0 1
18 1980 17–12 58.6% 1,636 0 2 1977 1–5 16.7% 1,504 0 2
19 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,582 0 2 1978 16–5 76.2% 1,781 0 4
20 1982 6–13 31.6% 1,589 0 2 1979 12–20 37.5% 1,753 0 4
21 1983 8–19 29.6% 1,531 0 2 1980 25–26 49.0% 1,774 0 4
22 1984 7–12 36.8% 1,563 0 2 1981 11–20 35.5% 1,696 0 4
23 1985 0–6 0.0% 1,503 0 2 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,541 0 4
24 1986 3–3 50.0% 1,519 0 2 1983 2–5 28.6% 1,518 0 4
25 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,478 0 2 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,512 0 4
26 1985 0–2 0.0% 1,479 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Leo Stacy Margolin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 1976 1 0 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1978 9 3 12 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%
21 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 14 7 21 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 14 23 39.1%
22 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8%
23 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 5 5 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% 32 34 66 48.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 13 19 31.6% 25 36 61 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Leo Stacy Margolin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1486 94.6 0.0% -4.75 +0.12
17 1979 1589 130.2 -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.81 1976 1524 94.1 +93 50.0% -1.00 +0.93
18 1980 1636 124.0 -22 -114 -14 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +2.01 1977 1505 107.1 +54 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–3 (0%) +0.64
19 1981 1583 114.6 -13 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +1.16 1978 1781 145.4 -10 68.8% +1.56 4–2 (67%) 0–2 +0.02
20 1982 1590 119.8 -84 -53 +9 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 -1.51 1979 1753 143.1 -3 -222 -184 42.5% -0.05 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 -0.85
21 1983 1531 107.7 -28 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.73 1980 1775 142.4 -13 -189 48.6% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.2 -1.56
22 1984 1564 112.7 -56 -58 +42 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.57 1981 1696 121.6 +33 -201 40.3% -1.19 3–7 (30%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 +0.05
23 1985 1504 94.7 -44 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 +0.34 1982 1542 96.6 +49 -85 +26 27.9% -1.70 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.55
24 1986 1520 96.8 -34 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) +1.27 1983 1519 103.3 +70 +32 37.5% -0.81 0–2 0–1 +0.45
25 1987 1479 99.1 0.0% -2.88 0–1 +0.22 1984 1512 99.5 33.3% -2.67 0–1 -0.14
26 1985 1480 92.2 0.0% -3.25 +0.25
Career 1674 118.6 -33 -67 +13 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.69 1855 135.3 +9 -148 -86 44.5% -0.36 16–30 (35%) 11–19 (37%) 92.2 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.