Susan Leo
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Alycia Moulton | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 1983 | H2H |
| Rene Blount | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 22, 1983 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 15, 1984 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Sylvia Hanika holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1984 Manhattan Beach round of 32 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-0 6-1 | Susan Leo | Match data | Oct 4, 1984* | R32 | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,674 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #5 | 48 | 2,135 | 415 | 239 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,949 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 2,000 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,082 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #5 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,879 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,920 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,919 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,806 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Susan Leo | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 17 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 18 | 1980 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 19 | 1981 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1979 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 20 | 1982 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% |
| 21 | 1983 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1981 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 26 | 10 | 36 | 72.2% |
| 22 | 1984 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% |
| 23 | 1985 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% |
| 24 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1984 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 25 | 1987 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 14 | 27 | 41 | 34.1% | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 24 | 38 | 62 | 38.7% | 3 | 13 | 16 | 18.8% | — | 99 | 60 | 159 | 62.3% | 129 | 64 | 193 | 66.8% | 38 | 32 | 70 | 54.3% | 144 | 80 | 224 | 64.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Susan Leo | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1977 | 1486 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.75 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1533 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +88 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.50 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.64 |
| 17 | 1979 | 1589 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -32 | 69.0% | +1.72 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.81 | 1977 | 1583 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +76 | -23 | — | 55.6% | +1.28 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +1.08 |
| 18 | 1980 | 1636 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -114 | -14 | 59.1% | +0.95 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.3 | +2.01 | 1978 | 1818 | 145.7 | — | — | — | — | -59 | -184 | -96 | 62.6% | +1.14 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.8 | +0.92 |
| 19 | 1981 | 1583 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -51 | +37 | 36.2% | -0.71 | 4–9 (31%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.5 | +1.16 | 1979 | 1950 | 158.1 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -104 | -186 | 57.9% | +0.65 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.5 | -2.88 |
| 20 | 1982 | 1590 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | -84 | -53 | +9 | 36.2% | -1.06 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–0 | — | -1.51 | 1980 | 2000 | 158.9 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -66 | -216 | 61.3% | +0.93 | 11–4 (73%) | 4–5 (44%) | 105.0 | -5.90 |
| 21 | 1983 | 1531 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +15 | +33 | 30.5% | -1.22 | 3–2 (60%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.5 | +0.73 | 1981 | 2083 | 166.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +24 | — | 68.4% | +1.72 | 12–7 (63%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.1 | -8.48 |
| 22 | 1984 | 1564 | 112.7 | — | — | — | — | -56 | -58 | +42 | 39.0% | -0.63 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.4 | +0.57 | 1982 | 1945 | 156.9 | — | — | — | — | +135 | +62 | -221 | 64.4% | +1.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.4 | -3.08 |
| 23 | 1985 | 1504 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | -44 | — | — | 7.7% | -2.77 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.34 | 1983 | 1970 | 162.8 | — | — | — | — | +80 | +36 | -190 | 63.4% | +1.12 | 17–8 (68%) | 6–8 (43%) | 100.3 | -1.00 |
| 24 | 1986 | 1520 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | -34 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.93 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +1.27 | 1984 | 1880 | 145.1 | — | — | — | — | +102 | +49 | -140 | 58.5% | +0.42 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–0 (100%) | 105.7 | -0.52 |
| 25 | 1987 | 1479 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.88 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.22 | 1985 | 1868 | 147.4 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +92 | — | 59.5% | +0.67 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.7 | -2.48 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1804 | 136.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +158 | -100 | 51.6% | -0.02 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.6 | -0.61 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1921 | 155.2 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +1 | -154 | 62.2% | +0.91 | 7–10 (41%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.6 | -1.68 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1919 | 153.3 | — | — | — | — | +53 | +15 | -189 | 61.6% | +0.85 | 14–5 (74%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.8 | -1.35 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1806 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +30 | +122 | — | 52.9% | +0.26 | 9–1 (90%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.4 | +0.61 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1703 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +152 | — | 50.0% | -0.35 | 2–6 (25%) | — | — | +0.80 |
| Career | — | 1674 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | -33 | -67 | +13 | 40.9% | -0.50 | 17–29 (37%) | 10–20 (33%) | 90.5 | +3.69 | — | 2136 | 159.8 | — | — | — | — | +38 | +22 | -162 | 61.2% | +0.90 | 114–67 (63%) | 50–53 (49%) | 100.1 | -3.69 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Alycia Moulton | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 1983 | H2H |
| Rene Blount | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 22, 1983 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | 7 | 11 | 18 | Mar 28, 1987 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 2 | 15 | 17 | Oct 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 2 | 14 | 16 | Aug 19, 1988 | H2H |
| Andrea Jaeger | 2 | 10 | 12 | Jan 3, 1983 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 8 | 11 | Nov 14, 1988 | H2H |