H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Susan Leo vs Tracy Austin H2H: 0-2
Tracy Austin holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Leo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1981 Australian Open third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1981* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Tracy Austin | 6-1 6-1 | Susan Leo | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Tracy Austin | 6-4 7-6 | Susan Leo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tracy Austin | #81 | #4 | 19 | 2,484 | 339 | 88 | 79.4% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Leo | Tracy Austin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 43–13 | 76.8% | — | 2,055 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 73–12 | 85.9% | — | 2,412 | 1 | 9 |
| 17 | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 81–10 | 89.0% | — | 2,383 | 1 | 19 |
| 18 | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 56–7 | 88.9% | — | 2,406 | 2 | 27 |
| 19 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 35–12 | 74.5% | — | 2,224 | 2 | 28 |
| 20 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 24–8 | 75.0% | — | 2,162 | 2 | 28 |
| 21 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #27 | 2,115 | 2 | 28 |
| 22 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 2,057 | 2 | 28 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,955 | 2 | 28 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,840 | 2 | 28 |