H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Susan Leo vs Trey Lewis H2H: 1-0

Susan Leo holds a 1–0 lead over Trey Lewis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Susan Leo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Susan Leo won the 1984 Salt Lake City round of 32 6-2 6-3.

AUS Age 64
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Susan Leo 6-2 6-3 Trey Lewis Match data Sep 13, 1984* R32 Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Leo 1,674 59 96 38.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Trey Lewis 1,536 23 53 30.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Leo Trey Lewis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–2 0.0% 1,485 0 0
17 1979 9–4 69.2% 1,588 0 1
18 1980 17–12 58.6% 1,636 0 2 1978 2–2 50.0% 1,503 0 0
19 1981 9–21 30.0% 1,582 0 2 1979 3–4 42.9% 1,521 0 1
20 1982 6–13 31.6% 1,589 0 2 1980 6–14 30.0% 1,516 0 1
21 1983 8–19 29.6% 1,531 0 2 1981 4–10 28.6% 1,521 0 1
22 1984 7–12 36.8% 1,563 0 2 1982 3–10 23.1% 1,482 0 1
23 1985 0–6 0.0% 1,503 0 2 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,477 0 1
24 1986 3–3 50.0% 1,519 0 2 1984 2–5 28.6% 1,447 0 1
25 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,478 0 2 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,442 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Leo Trey Lewis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1979 3 4 7 42.9%
18 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 1981 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
21 1983 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 14 27 41 34.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 24 38 62 38.7% 3 13 16 18.8% 11 24 35 31.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 9 11 18.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Leo Trey Lewis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1486 94.6 0.0% -4.75 +0.12
17 1979 1589 130.2 -32 69.0% +1.72 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.81
18 1980 1636 124.0 -22 -114 -14 59.1% +0.95 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +2.01 1978 1503 104.8 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–1 +0.13
19 1981 1583 114.6 -13 -51 +37 36.2% -0.71 4–9 (31%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +1.16 1979 1521 113.5 +81 +56 47.1% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.1 +0.87
20 1982 1590 119.8 -84 -53 +9 36.2% -1.06 4–5 (44%) 1–0 -1.51 1980 1517 113.6 +29 33.3% -0.98 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 +1.11
21 1983 1531 107.7 -28 +15 +33 30.5% -1.22 3–2 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 100.5 +0.73 1981 1521 114.4 +64 +7 41.7% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) 93.5 -0.13
22 1984 1564 112.7 -56 -58 +42 39.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.57 1982 1482 106.8 +22 +3 37.1% -0.69 2–7 (22%) 0–2 +0.82
23 1985 1504 94.7 -44 7.7% -2.77 0–1 0–2 +0.34 1983 1477 100.3 +11 +60 39.1% -0.57 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +0.75
24 1986 1520 96.8 -34 50.0% -0.93 1–1 3–1 (75%) +1.27 1984 1448 90.5 -2 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +1.08
25 1987 1479 99.1 0.0% -2.88 0–1 +0.22 1985 1442 100.3 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.03
Career 1674 118.6 -33 -67 +13 40.9% -0.50 17–29 (37%) 10–20 (33%) 90.5 +3.69 1536 111.0 +32 +17 +60 38.2% -0.69 9–25 (26%) 6–20 (23%) 82.9 +6.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.