H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sybille Bammer vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 3-3

Sybille Bammer and Anna Chakvetadze are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2010 Linz third round 7-5 6-0.

AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 2010* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Sybille Bammer #72 7-5 6-0 Anna Chakvetadze #66 Match data
Aug 28, 2009* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #75 4-6 6-4 7-5 Sybille Bammer #29 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sybille Bammer #29 3-6 6-4 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #48 Match data
Jul 25, 2008* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Sybille Bammer #30 6-4 5-7 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #8 Match data
Feb 16, 2007* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #12 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 Sybille Bammer #47 Match data
Jan 17, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #13 6-4 7-5 Sybille Bammer #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,844 130 139 48.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Bammer Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0
18 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0
19 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6
21 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7
22 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8
24 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8
25 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,492 0 0 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8
26 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,569 0 0
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2008 24–24 50.0% #26 1,682 0 1
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,662 0 2
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,646 0 2
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,569 0 2