H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sybille Bammer vs Emma Laine H2H: 0-1

Emma Laine holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Laine leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Laine won the 2006 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Emma Laine
FIN Age 40 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emma Laine #64 6-3 6-1 Sybille Bammer #43 Match data Jul 20, 2006* R32 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Emma Laine #1,001 #50 429 1,577 21 38 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Bammer Emma Laine
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #843 1,487 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #870 1,472 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #166 1,489 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 4–6 40.0% #92 1,505 0 0
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0 2006 13–22 37.1% #74 1,525 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 2–6 25.0% #247 1,492 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #399 1,503 0 0
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Bammer Emma Laine
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 12 15 27 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — 20 28 48 41.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Bammer Emma Laine
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1472 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1490 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1505 106.3 -0.89 -0.92 0.800 44.9% +33 — — 39.1% -1.00 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.01
20 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 2006 1526 120.2 +0.10 -0.37 1.017 49.8% +30 -49 — 40.0% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.40
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1493 108.2 -2.28 -2.33 0.832 46.0% +33 — — 31.6% -0.84 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.07
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1504 102.0 +0.67 +1.36 0.876 46.8% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.04
23 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.6 +4.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83 — 1578 114.5 -0.50 -0.76 0.943 48.3% +31 -49 — 37.7% -0.88 7–9 (44%) 5–9 (36%) 95.7 -1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.