H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 1-1
Sybille Bammer and Katarina Srebotnik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2010 Indian Wells first round 3-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2008* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |