H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 10:32 UTC
Tamara Korpatsch vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 1-1
Tamara Korpatsch and Aleksandra Krunic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamara Korpatsch leads 1–0 on clay, while Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamara Korpatsch won the 2019 Prague third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tamara Korpatsch | 6-3 6-2 | Aleksandra Krunic | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2019* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Aleksandra Krunic | 6-0 7-5 | Tamara Korpatsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Korpatsch | #75 | #71 | 951 | 1,731 | 46 | 72 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Korpatsch | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #164 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #117 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #74 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |