H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Tamara Korpatsch vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 0-1
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 1–0 lead over Tamara Korpatsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2024 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 31
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-2 | Tamara Korpatsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Korpatsch | #75 | #71 | 951 | 1,731 | 46 | 72 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Korpatsch | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #164 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #117 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #74 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2023 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 |
| 31 | 2026 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |