H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anastasia Potapova holds a 3–1 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Potapova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2025 Australian Open first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | 6-2 7-5 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | Jan 13, 2025 | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Tamara Zidansek | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data | Oct 7, 2022* | R16 | Monastir | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Anastasia Potapova | 1-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | Mar 6, 2020* | R16 | Monterrey Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Anastasia Potapova | 3-6 6-4 5-2 (ret.) | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | Jul 28, 2018* | SF | Moscow River Cup | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #146 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,803 | 80 | 91 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anastasia Potapova | #25 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 168 | 136 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #25 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #146 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2022 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 23 | 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2024 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2025 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 14 | 4 | 18 | 77.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 34 | 51 | 85 | 40.0% | 42 | 33 | 75 | 56.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | 99 | 93 | 192 | 51.6% | 57 | 29 | 86 | 66.3% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/170 of Tamara Zidansek's and 289/306 of Anastasia Potapova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 45.2% | 47.4% | 39.1% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 51.2% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13/13 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 53.4% | 66.4% | 45.1% | 60.2% | 45.2% | 56.5% | 46.3% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 6.0 | 51.4% | 60.6% | 41.1% | 53.0% | 45.4% | 51.0% | 43.6% |
| 19 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 68.3% | 46.5% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 49.2% | 38.9% | 2020 | 10/10 | 3.2 | 4.9 | 52.1% | 64.6% | 47.2% | 46.9% | 48.4% | 55.8% | 46.2% |
| 20 | 2018 | 14/14 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 65.4% | 57.7% | 42.3% | 44.7% | 51.2% | 52.5% | 48.6% | 2021 | 30/31 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 53.9% | 64.6% | 42.0% | 49.2% | 50.1% | 53.8% | 43.8% |
| 21 | 2019 | 33/34 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 68.5% | 58.2% | 42.0% | 53.9% | 44.6% | 53.1% | 42.8% | 2022 | 41/42 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 63.3% | 63.5% | 45.7% | 51.0% | 52.1% | 56.5% | 47.7% |
| 22 | 2020 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 68.3% | 59.5% | 47.5% | 55.0% | 48.5% | 55.6% | 43.3% | 2023 | 47/47 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.9% | 63.6% | 44.6% | 55.2% | 45.0% | 55.5% | 45.4% |
| 23 | 2021 | 41/43 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 64.9% | 62.8% | 45.6% | 49.4% | 50.9% | 56.7% | 45.0% | 2024 | 48/48 | 2.3 | 4.8 | 55.5% | 64.4% | 43.4% | 56.9% | 46.7% | 55.1% | 43.4% |
| 24 | 2022 | 30/32 | 1.3 | 3.6 | 63.1% | 61.5% | 42.8% | 49.8% | 48.5% | 54.3% | 41.4% | 2025 | 26/40 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 52.9% | 62.3% | 46.2% | 46.5% | 46.3% | 54.6% | 41.7% |
| 25 | 2023 | 14/14 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 68.0% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 53.3% | 54.1% | 51.1% | 46.1% | 2026 | 43/44 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 56.4% | 65.0% | 42.0% | 55.9% | 53.8% | 54.7% | 44.7% |
| 26 | 2024 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 63.5% | 57.8% | 38.8% | 46.4% | 36.2% | 51.2% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 6/7 | 1.7 | 4.7 | 59.6% | 64.0% | 44.6% | 51.1% | 61.9% | 55.8% | 47.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 164/171 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 65.7% | 59.9% | 43.7% | 50.7% | 48.9% | 54.2% | 43.9% | — | 289/306 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 63.7% | 43.8% | 53.2% | 48.4% | 54.8% | 44.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1476 | 93.4 | -2.12 | +2.32 | 0.895 | 47.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1607 | 121.2 | +0.26 | +1.15 | 1.064 | 51.7% | -33 | +21 | — | 62.1% | +0.55 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.92 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1596 | 119.2 | -3.93 | +0.45 | 0.889 | 47.4% | -23 | +78 | — | 47.1% | -0.33 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.0 | -0.21 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1484 | 98.5 | -0.11 | -0.64 | 0.766 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 2020 | 1685 | 126.6 | -0.49 | +1.81 | 1.046 | 50.5% | -11 | — | — | 54.2% | +0.17 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.7 | +0.34 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.1 | -1.96 | +2.38 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -117 | +98 | — | 55.2% | +0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.28 | 2021 | 1686 | 132.7 | -1.94 | +1.28 | 0.948 | 48.7% | +15 | -64 | -81 | 44.1% | -0.59 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.7 | -1.41 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1642 | 115.3 | -2.75 | -0.57 | 0.912 | 48.3% | -135 | +147 | -8 | 43.4% | -0.60 | 9–8 (53%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.4 | -0.17 | 2022 | 1751 | 139.2 | -0.34 | +3.77 | 1.098 | 52.0% | -56 | +77 | — | 55.8% | +0.50 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.9 | -1.01 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1613 | 128.8 | -0.74 | +0.40 | 0.974 | 49.8% | -65 | +134 | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.1 | -0.44 | 2023 | 1785 | 143.8 | -0.78 | +2.73 | 1.022 | 50.4% | -38 | +98 | -91 | 56.4% | +0.32 | 17–10 (63%) | 6–7 (46%) | 105.1 | -0.08 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1727 | 132.9 | +0.46 | +0.75 | 1.038 | 50.9% | -162 | +227 | — | 54.1% | +0.16 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–2 (78%) | 108.2 | +0.90 | 2024 | 1800 | 140.8 | -1.22 | +0.81 | 0.965 | 49.4% | +5 | +41 | -88 | 54.7% | +0.18 | 10–6 (63%) | 2–8 (20%) | 99.1 | +0.19 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1596 | 120.1 | -1.76 | -0.99 | 0.907 | 47.9% | +16 | +119 | -18 | 41.7% | -0.61 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.49 | 2025 | 1840 | 139.6 | -1.70 | -0.49 | 0.920 | 48.4% | -30 | +40 | — | 54.9% | +0.12 | 9–4 (69%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.3 | -0.67 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1678 | 119.9 | -2.90 | +0.63 | 0.942 | 48.6% | -80 | +129 | — | 48.5% | -0.64 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.0 | -0.10 | 2026 | 1877 | 144.9 | -1.41 | +1.96 | 0.988 | 50.0% | -85 | +155 | -231 | 55.9% | +0.35 | 12–5 (71%) | 5–7 (42%) | 105.9 | +0.55 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1638 | 109.0 | -2.73 | -2.13 | 0.825 | 45.6% | -61 | +156 | — | 36.0% | -1.32 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–0 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1593 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1676 | 113.6 | -0.32 | +0.55 | 1.081 | 51.7% | -13 | +54 | — | 52.9% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1804 | 125.5 | -1.42 | +0.07 | 0.958 | 49.2% | -86 | +154 | -14 | 46.9% | -0.34 | 33–32 (51%) | 27–16 (63%) | 106.1 | +0.86 | — | 1966 | 142.0 | -1.36 | +1.66 | 0.988 | 49.8% | -28 | +77 | -115 | 53.8% | +0.15 | 71–46 (61%) | 36–41 (47%) | 105.9 | -0.38 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 14, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Martic | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 12, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucia Bronzetti | 6 | 0 | 6 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Mirra Andreeva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 30, 2026 | H2H |