H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Anastasia Potapova H2H: 1-3
Anastasia Potapova holds a 3–1 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Potapova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2025 Australian Open first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anastasia Potapova | 6-2 7-5 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2022* | Monastir | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tamara Zidansek | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2020* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Potapova | 1-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2018* | Moscow River Cup | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anastasia Potapova | 3-6 6-4 5-2 (ret.) | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |