H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 1-0
Tamara Zidansek holds a 1–0 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2019 Eastbourne second round 4-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2019* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Tamara Zidansek | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Carla Suárez Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |