H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Maddison Inglis H2H: 1-0
Tamara Zidansek holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2022 Adelaide 2 fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2022* | Adelaide 2 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tamara Zidansek | 6-2 6-1 | Maddison Inglis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maddison Inglis | #151 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Maddison Inglis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |