H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Jamea Jackson H2H: 1-1

Tamarine Tanasugarn and Jamea Jackson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2006 Bangkok round of 16 6-1 2-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jamea Jackson
USA Age 40 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #97 6-1 2-0 (ret.) Jamea Jackson #52 Match data Oct 13, 2006* R16 Bangkok Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jamea Jackson #89 7-6(5) 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #137 Match data Jan 18, 2006* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jamea Jackson #382 #43 479 1,662 33 50 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Jamea Jackson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #444 1,491 0 0
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0 2004 2–5 28.6% #156 1,482 0 0
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0 2005 10–14 41.7% #80 1,520 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0 2006 19–19 50.0% #45 1,608 0 0
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 2007 0–6 0.0% #588 1,539 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 2008 2–5 28.6% #273 1,529 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Jamea Jackson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
20 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2% — 20 37 57 35.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Jamea Jackson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17 2003 1492 100.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
17 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06 2004 1483 106.1 -0.74 -0.28 0.892 47.5% -1 — — 46.7% -0.07 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.03
18 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28 2005 1521 117.6 -0.08 -0.13 1.020 50.4% -39 — +118 43.6% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.8 -0.78
19 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66 2006 1609 128.7 -0.56 +0.41 1.005 50.0% -63 -80 +192 53.5% +0.27 6–8 (43%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.35
20 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65 2007 1540 95.2 -4.69 -3.50 0.583 38.5% -33 — — 7.7% -3.54 0–1 — — -0.44
21 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91 2008 1530 101.3 -3.99 -0.29 0.755 43.5% -25 — — 28.6% -2.21 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
22 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57 — 1662 120.0 -1.40 -0.31 0.907 47.8% -44 -80 +164 44.3% -0.45 9–18 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 96.4 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.