H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 3-0

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 3–0 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2001 Miami third round 6-2 4-6 6-4.

THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 0
3 main draw meetings
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #26 6-2 4-6 6-4 Kveta Peschke #48 Match data
Jun 23, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #63 6-1 6-4 Kveta Peschke #74 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #42 6-0 7-5 Kveta Peschke #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,826 92 115 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Kveta Peschke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1
23 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,699 0 1
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0 2000 18–15 54.5% #47 1,809 0 1
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,716 0 1
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,676 0 1
27 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,676 0 1
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,770 0 1
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,593 0 1
31 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,599 0 1
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4