H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Tamira Paszek vs Olivia Rogowska H2H: 1-0
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Olivia Rogowska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2011 Hobart third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 6-1 6-3 | Olivia Rogowska | Match data | Jan 13, 2011* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Olivia Rogowska | #927 | #102 | 626 | 1,505 | 7 | 35 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamira Paszek | Olivia Rogowska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #127 | 1,378 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,354 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,359 | 0 | 0 |