H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Tanya Harford vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-1

Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1980 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tanya Harford
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-1 Tanya Harford Match data Nov 7, 1980* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tanya Harford — — — 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tanya Harford Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4
16 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7
17 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,512 0 0 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9
18 1977 7–13 35.0% — 1,559 0 0 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10
19 1978 3–6 33.3% — 1,558 0 0 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10
20 1979 13–10 56.5% — 1,716 0 0 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10
21 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,673 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10
22 1981 8–10 44.4% — 1,630 0 0 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10
23 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tanya Harford Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7%
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1979 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tanya Harford Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 1974 1497 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.14 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47
16 1975 1479 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.26 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68
17 1976 1512 106.0 — — — — +67 +25 — 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 — +0.59 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09
18 1977 1559 123.8 — — — — +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88
19 1978 1559 111.9 — — — — +34 — — 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.55 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
20 1979 1716 133.6 — — — — -51 — -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47
21 1980 1674 130.7 — — — — -52 — -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1981 1631 111.6 — — — — +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16
23 1982 1629 118.4 — — — — — -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1785 128.9 — — — — -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.