H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tanya Harford vs Anne Smith H2H: 0-1

Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1980 Cincinnati Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tanya Harford
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-4 6-4 Tanya Harford Match data Jan 10, 1980* R32 Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tanya Harford — — — 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne Smith — — — 2,051 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tanya Harford Anne Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,512 0 0 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1
18 1977 7–13 35.0% — 1,559 0 0 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2
19 1978 3–6 33.3% — 1,558 0 0 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,849 0 2
20 1979 13–10 56.5% — 1,716 0 0 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2
21 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,673 0 0 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,936 0 2
22 1981 8–10 44.4% — 1,630 0 0 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2
23 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,629 0 0 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,898 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,874 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,900 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,718 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,785 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,777 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,850 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tanya Harford Anne Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
19 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8%
20 1979 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
21 1980 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3%
22 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7%
23 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
Career — 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8% — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tanya Harford Anne Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1497 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1479 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1512 106.0 — — — — +67 +25 — 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 — +0.59 1977 1634 138.6 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.53
18 1977 1559 123.8 — — — — +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04 1978 1777 139.8 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.88
19 1978 1559 111.9 — — — — +34 — — 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.55 1979 1849 152.6 — — — — -9 -187 -232 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.77
20 1979 1716 133.6 — — — — -51 — -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24 1980 1866 144.9 — — — — -31 -177 -216 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 -5.69
21 1980 1674 130.7 — — — — -52 — -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35 1981 1936 153.7 — — — — +39 -231 -156 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67
22 1981 1631 111.6 — — — — +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28 1982 1899 156.9 — — — — +43 -216 -37 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.82
23 1982 1629 118.4 — — — — — -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 1983 1898 139.9 — — — — +42 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.37
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1875 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.29
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1900 131.1 — — — — — -248 -3 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.34
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1719 120.9 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.98
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1786 131.9 — — — — +7 — +60 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.68
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.68
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -6 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -8 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30
Career — 1785 128.9 — — — — -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85 — 2051 154.3 — — — — +14 -189 -73 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.1 -4.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.