H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Anne Smith H2H: 0-1
Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1980 Cincinnati third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1980* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-4 6-4 | Tanya Harford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |