H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Annette Van Zyl H2H: 1-0
Tanya Harford holds a 1–0 lead over Annette Van Zyl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tanya Harford won the 1977 Johannesburg third round 5-7 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 82
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1977* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tanya Harford | 5-7 7-6 6-1 | Annette Van Zyl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Annette Van Zyl | — | — | — | 1,900 | 107 | 46 | 69.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Annette Van Zyl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 49–12 | 80.3% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 11–1 | 91.7% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |